Hi Eimantas, thanks for your comment, and I appreciate you reading till the end.

One of the points I'm tried to convey was the difference between private captial, and venture investors.

I understand the need for safe investments, but that is not where VC should be. Today, most of VCs could fall within a category of growth investment, some risk but no venture at all.

The whole notion of MVP validates my point, investment is only viable once the product (technology) is built, and the market (demand) validated. But that model leaves no space for investing, and deploying capital on the development of new technology (let alone creating new markets).

As in the last lines of the conclusions, this is not a critisism, but rather an opportunity for risk-takers, that understand technology to capitalize on human potential.